Unmasking the Truth: MPs Challenge Gambling Firms' Fears Over Tax Hikes
The Treasury Committee has called out the gambling industry’s ’scaremongering’ regarding proposed tax increases on online betting. They argue that the government must implement a tax rate that accurately reflects the harm these games cause. Chancellor Rachel Reeves had previously considered raising taxes in the Budget, noting that online gambling now generates nearly 50% of industry revenue.
Bookmakers are warning that higher taxes could result in the closure of numerous betting shops and significant job losses. However, the committee expressed skepticism regarding the industry’s claims that gambling is free from social consequences. MP Dame Meg Hillier emphasized the negative impact of online betting on individuals and communities, attributing addictive behaviors to these platforms.
In contrast, Grainne Hurst, CEO of the Betting and Gaming Council, referenced NHS statistics suggesting only 0.4% of adults are problem gamblers, defending the industry’s economic contributions, including £6.8 billion to the economy and £4 billion in taxes. Unlike many other markets, winnings from gambling are not taxed in the UK.
The article details various tax rates currently imposed on betting activities, including 21% on online casino gaming and 15% on sports fixtures. It reflects on rising political support for increasing taxes on gambling firms, with nearly 25% of Labour MPs advocating for the move to alleviate benefit restrictions for larger families.
Opponents of new taxes, such as Betfred’s Fred Done, warned that imposing higher taxes could threaten the existence of their 1,287 UK shops, with predictions that a 5% rise could lead to substantial operational losses.
Responses from the Treasury confirm that tax policy will be decided by the Chancellor, with ongoing consultations regarding the impacts of the growth in remote gambling since 2015. MPs’ calls to action indicate a burgeoning confrontation between regulatory efforts and the gaming industry’s financial interests.