Unpacking the UK-US Tariff Deal: A Mixed Bag of Gains and Challenges

In a recent trade deal between the UK and US, tariffs have seen modifications that could impact various industries significantly. While President Donald Trump maintains a blanket 10% tariff on most UK goods, specific reductions or removals have been made.

The deal notably eases tariffs on UK exports such as cars, steel, and aluminium. It reduces the import tax on UK cars from 25% to 10%, but only for a quota of 100,000 vehicles. Beyond that limit, cars will incur a steep 27.5% tariff, potentially stifling the competitive edge for UK automobile manufacturers. Furthermore, Trump hinted at possible cuts to the 10% tariff imposed by the UK on US vehicle imports, adding another layer of negotiation.

For steel and aluminium, a 25% tariff has been eliminated, a relief especially for UK companies like British Steel. Although the UK exports a modest amount in these metals (around £700m), the waiver extends to derivatives, impacting products worth approximately £2.2bn of UK exports in various sectors.

However, the pharmaceutical sector remains in limbo as specifics are yet to be negotiated. With medicinal and pharmaceutical exports amounting to £6.6bn last year, clarity on tariffs here is crucial.

On the digital front, the UK’s 2% digital services tax remains intact despite expectations of a revision. Conversations are ongoing about a digital trade deal aimed at simplifying processes for firms exporting to the US.

Additionally, the deal allows UK farmers a tariff-free quota of 13,000 metric tonnes for agricultural exports, making this a historic move. Yet, the UK government has assured that food standards will not be compromised, retaining bans on practices like growth hormones in beef production.

Lastly, the scrapping of the ethanol tariff used for beer production signifies further benefits for American exports. This deal, although termed not a full free trade agreement, sets the stage for future negotiations and adjustments that could have lasting implications on UK-US trade relations.

Samuel wycliffe