A Critical Crossroads: Empowering Dying Adults Through Extended Debates on Assisted Dying Bill

Peers in the House of Lords have been granted an extra 10 days to review the assisted dying bill due to a record number of amendments causing concerns over timely passage into law. This follows a historic vote in June where the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill received backing from MPs, and now requires the agreement of the Lords to finalize its wording.

The proposed legislation aims to allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales—with less than six months to live—to apply for an assisted death, contingent upon the approval of two doctors and a panel including a social worker, senior legal figure, and psychiatrist. However, there are worries that opposition members may be stalling the process by submitting a significant number of amendments, with fewer than 30 of the 1,000+ changes discussed after just two of the scheduled four days reserved for scrutiny.

Dame Esther Rantzen, a well-known advocate and founder of Childline, who is currently facing terminal cancer, has urged peers not to ‘sabotage democracy’ as the deadline for agreement approaches. Meanwhile, Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, who introduced the bill, expressed her disappointment at the slow progress and the obstruction tactics being used.

In a proactive move, the government, while maintaining a neutral stance, announced 10 additional Fridays for thorough discussions, planned between January 9 and April 24. This decision has been welcomed as it provides an unprecedented opportunity for comprehensive debate on this sensitive and crucial issue.

Lord Roy Kennedy emphasized the importance of allowing sufficient time for scrutiny, citing the high volume of amendments, and insisting that the additional debating time is essential for responsible governance. Leadbeater reiterated the importance of these discussions to ensure that the bill not only progresses effectively but also enhances the dignity and choices available for individuals at the end of their lives.

As the deadline approaches, this widespread scrutiny may pave the way for significant changes to allow vulnerable individuals a dignified choice in their final days while ensuring proper safeguards are in place.