The Battle Over Assisted Dying: Lords Seek More Time for Scrutiny

In a heated debate among peers regarding the legislation for assisted dying in England and Wales, significant concerns have arisen about the pace and thoroughness of its examination. The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, which suggests allowing terminally ill adults with less than six months to live the option for an assisted death, has garnered over 900 amendments—a record for a bill initiated by a backbench MP. Supporters of the bill fear that the numerous proposed changes serve as a delaying tactic, complicating the progress towards its acceptance, while opponents argue that amendments are crucial to protect vulnerable individuals and ensure the system’s safety.

The House of Lords has spent nearly five hours discussing changes to the bill but managed to only address a small fraction of the amendments. Lord Andrew Tyrie, a supporter of the bill, emphasized the need for additional time for a proper review, voicing concerns about the potential for the legislation to be ”talked out” before reaching a decision by spring of next year, when the current parliamentary session concludes. He insisted that the government should take control of the amendment process to ensure comprehensive national consultation.

Baroness Elizabeth Berridge, opposing the bill, acknowledged that the debates raised significant points, particularly around devolution implications and the Mental Capacity Act, underscoring the importance of thorough scrutiny that peers must provide—especially on a matter deemed to be one of conscience with no party lines dictating voting.

With the next stages of debate set, calls for more time underscore the complex intersection of ethical, legal, and social considerations surrounding assisted dying. If passed, a government roll-out of the assisted dying service could be expected by 2030, marking a significant shift in end-of-life choices in the UK.